Monday, May 27, 2013

dee Josephine pics Headshots


dee Josephine pics Headshots

dee Josephine pics Headshots I like those pics! Easy for me thats all,they are very Pro.I  finally got it right and smiling. thx beauty! you did me solid. castings up. now for the auditions. come by when youre in the neighborhood. we're at warner now. miss seeing your face.Photography from your guys was simple and thanks for letting me use your discount. HANGING WITH JUSTIN IS SICK!!!
  • show up at the set in burbank by 6:30
  • be ready for hair and make up by 8:30
  • in costume for party scenes then to green screen
  • crew lunch 1:30 then table read in my trailer
  • back on set for final scenes before tomorrows wrap party
  • be with Selena and I before the premiere 
dee Josephine pics Headshots

dee Josephine pics Headshots Hollywood has a way of deriving the wrong lessons from both failure and success. So in bidding a final farewell to “Smash” — which wrapped up its tumultuous two-season run with a “Let’s dump this on Memorial Day weekend” two-hour finale Sunday — a few parting thoughts.
Whenever something ostensibly risky doesn’t work, TV execs — particularly those laboring at the major networks — like to use that to bolster their impulse to stick to the tried and true. In this case, many argued before the series premiered that it’s primarily elites on the coasts who attend musical theater, so it’s easy for showbiz types to delude themselves into thinking there’s a mass audience for a series about a Broadway show. Frankly, this argument is as old as “Cop Rock,” which — unlike “Smash” — didn’t even open.
Still, “Smash” didn’t fail because it was a musical soap opera. It failed because (unlike “Cop Rock”) it was a bad musical soap opera — or more specifically, because the promise of its first few episodes and thrill of discovering its female leads vying for the part of Marilyn Monroe, Katharine McPhee and Megan Hilty, wasn’t sustained past episode three. The margin for error might be smaller for a show like “Smash,” but assuming that’s true, there were nevertheless far too many creative missteps to survive.
The producers, moreover, stumbled not with the relative unknowns they assembled, but foremost with the recognizable names, particularly Debra Messing and to a lesser degree Anjelica Huston. In short, they seemingly didn’t trust a show about hungry young Broadway wannabes to get by on theatrical talent, but rather felt compelled to surround them with stars, whose plots were almost uniformly teeth-gnashing. Stunt casting in the later episodes (Sean Hayes, all is not forgiven) only made matters worse.
As New York Times theater critic Charles Isherwood shrewdly observed, the series repeatedly engaged in “the kind of compromises that can turn an edgy, fresh show into something that resembles a bland, assembly-line-produced product: precisely what ‘Smash’ turned out to be.” Indeed, it’s hard to say “Smash” lacked the courage of its convictions, because in hindsight, it’s hard to discern what those convictions were.
Finally, NBC did the show no favors by continuing to cling to its “These aren’t the droids you’re looking for” public-relations approach when many perceived (correctly, I’d argue) that the program had gone off the rails creatively in addition to losing a sizable chunk of its audience. That included NBC Entertainment chief Robert Greenblatt adhering to his description of the program as “an unqualified success,” when you didn’t need to be a research ace to recognize the claim didn’t hold water.
The closing hours highlighted just how seriously the show had lost its way, which included producing music videos that dispensed with any connection between original songs being rehearsed and performed on stage and people walking down the street (multiple people, in the case of a tepid cover of Queen’s “Under Pressure”) belting out tunes. Fittingly, the final image (andSPOILER ALERT, assuming anyone cares) was a McPhee-Hilty show-stopper, which only reinforced, in a melancholy way, just how much the initial spark had been lost.
During the finale, Messing’s character huffs at one point that the press “will twist anything for a story.”
Perhaps so. But in the case of “Smash,” the media vultures didn’t really need to bother. The show failed. But that’s not a referendum on musicals, or serialized dramas, or shows with too many gay characters, or networks trying to do something a little bit different or outside their comfort zones.
It’s simply a referendum on “Smash.”


dee josephine pics headshots

dee josephine pics headshots There are two questions regarding “Arrested Development,” which returned this weekend via Netflix: Is it good — or as good as it was — and does that really matter? Regarding the second, probably not. That’s because Netflix is emulating HBO by playing the attention-getting game, and as with “House of Cards,” reviving this Emmy-winning comedy has brought the service ample media coverage, reinforcing the perceived value of its original-programming efforts. So a vacillating answer to the first part is virtually irrelevant, especially since Netflix opted not to make episodes available in advance, allowing die-hards and critics (in this case, a group with considerable overlap) to weigh in simultaneously.
Unlike “House of Cards” — a fine if hardly groundbreaking serialized drama— the prospect of binge viewing (Netflix’s main distribution innovation) this new 15-episode batch of “Arrested Development” feels less like a treat than a rather numbing burden. The program’s arched eyebrows, rapid-fire gags and snark actually play better when spread out, and trying to power through multiple episodes felt exactly like that — a bit like cramming for a test the night before.
That’s not to say the cast and series creator Mitchell Hurwitz (who directed with Troy Miller) don’t deliver their share of moments, although the format has a way of blunting them. Each episode essentially focuses on one of the characters, but they frequently intersect — an ambitious narrative approach, if one also seemingly designed to narrow the program’s appeal even further. Inasmuch as the show was canceled for precisely that niche quality despite all its accolades, it’s perhaps advantageous Netflix has resisted releasing user data, allowing the media to create its own echo chamber amplifying the show’s impact, irrespective of the reality.



dee Josephine pics Headshots
dee Josephine pics Headshots Bracamontes Photography
This business serves Los Angeles, CA 
626-806-3306



Independent Photography
This business serves Los Angeles, CA 
323-724-6399



George Bennett Photography
1340 W. 4th Street, Los Angeles, CA, 90017 
213 537-0513



Isaac Matthew White Photography
This business serves Los Angeles, CA 
323-252-7770



Samy B Photography
This business serves Los Angeles, CA 
714-614-7954



Hair by Erica
This business serves Los Angeles, CA 
714-269-3029



Huntington Beach Photography
This business serves Los Angeles, CA 
800-280-0060



Image Factory West
This business serves Los Angeles, CA 
213-687-8593



Kitschy Katz
This business serves Los Angeles, CA 
310-325-5229


No comments:

Post a Comment